Moreover, the display has a 9, K colour temperature, which is much higher than the ideal temperature.

Our test device has high DeltaE grey and colour deviations too, which means that the display is comparatively colour inaccurate. The display also has a slight blue tint to it, which is disappointing. The J4 Plus is easy to use outside thanks to its bright display, although you may struggle to read the screen in direct sunlight.

The IPS display also has strong viewing angles. We did not notice brightness or colour distortions even at acute viewing angles, so the J4 Plus should remain usable at practically any angle. The Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC has been around for almost three years, which makes it old in the fast-moving world of smartphone tech. The quad-core processor still performs comparatively well though by today's standards.

The Galaxy J4 Plus performed well in our benchmarks, primarily because many of our comparison devices are equipped with the same SoC. In daily use, the J4 Plus generally feels snappy, although we did notice occasional short delays when switching between apps or when we subjected it to sustained load. The Galaxy J4 Plus loads websites quickly, although media content takes a bit longer to appear.

The microSD card reader is quick too, but it has slower read speeds than most of our comparison devices. Moreover, maximum graphics are often unavailable, like in Shadow Fight 3. The Galaxy J4 Plus manages its surface temperatures well. Our test device reaches a maximum of Our test device also does not thermal throttle, which we confirmed by running the GFXBench T-Rex benchmark 30 times on a loop. Frame rates remained mostly consistent throughout the benchmark loop and finished only marginally lower than when we began the benchmark.

Incidentally, the more complex Manhattan benchmark would not run on our test device. The Galaxy J4 Plus has a single speaker on the right-hand side of the frame. Its positioning means that most people will struggle to obscure the speaker when holding the device in landscape mode, but you may cover it with your hand when holding the device in portrait mode depending on your grip. The speaker reaches We noticed no audio distortion even at high volumes, although the frequency range is dominated by mid and high tones. Our test device delivers listenable audio quality over the included headphones or via Bluetooth.

The Galaxy J4 Plus consumes comparatively little at idle and is more efficient than all but the LG K11 of our comparison devices. Our test device is generally economic under load too, although it consumes more than many of our comparison devices when it is pushed hard. By contrast, the Nokia 2. The J4 Plus also lasted around 14 hours in our H. In short, the J4 Plus has good battery life, but it does not significantly outlast some of our comparison devices with 3, mAh batteries.

The Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus is an impressive budget smartphone. Its 6-inch display and stylish design make the device look more expensive than it is, while its dual-SIM functionality, bright IPS display, long battery life and Android 8. The Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus is an excellent entry-level smartphone that is great value for money. The ageing Qualcomm Snapdragon SoC is still doing surprisingly well in , but it cannot run complex games like Asphalt 9: The list of other drawbacks is pleasingly short though. We would have liked to see a fingerprint sensor and a USB Type-C port, but alas Samsung reserves these for its more-expensive devices.

The lack of a USB Type-C port also means that there is no fast-charging functionality, and the device can only connect to 2. Overall, the Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus is a good option for those who are looking for a budget smartphone with a large display. The device would not look out of place next to its more-expensive Galaxy A and S series siblings too, which is a testament to how well designed the Galaxy J4 Plus is. Android Smartphone Touchscreen.

Working For Notebookcheck. Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM Qualcomm Adreno LTE Cat. Bands 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, Dual-Nano SIM: SAR values: Head - 0. Primary Camera: Single speaker on the right-hand side of the device, Keyboard: Samsung homepage Samsung notebook section. The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications. Left-hand side: Right-hand side: No connections.

Micro-USB 2. Default home screen. Default app drawer. Preinstalled Google apps. Preinstalled Microsoft apps. Preinstalled Samsung apps. Storage Information. Device Information. GPS Test: Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus - Overview. Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus — Cycling around a lake. Samsung Galaxy J4 Plus - Loop. Garmin Edge - Overview. Garmin Edge — Cycling around a lake. Garmin Edge - Loop. Photo taken with the rear-facing camera. Photo taken with the front-facing camera. Image Comparison Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. IT Pro Portal The Galaxy S9 Plus is undoubtedly a seriously impressive device, featuring the biggest and best screen, and most powerful hardware, seen in the company's line-up to date.

Droid Life As I stressed already, though, Samsung is not known for timely software updates. Overall, this is certainly an impressive all-rounder from Samsung. Ausdroid Samsung's Galaxy S8 was easily the best smartphone released in , though it had a few minor flaws. Come , Samsung has fixed those, added more power, RAM and a camera that's a good order of magnitude or maybe more better. I have little hesitation in saying this is the best phone you can buy in , and might be for some time. Exynos and Snapdragon at fps Source: Samsung finally offers a GB version for those who need it.

It has the same old front camera and Bixby is still not up to the mark compared to Google Assistant, when it comes to showing the info you need. The camera quality is still not up to the mark when compared to the Pixel 2 series or the iPhone X, especially in low-light, since Pixel 2 images offer better shadow and highlight and portraits are obviously better in Pixel 2. The best Android flagship, best camera too Source: The Indian Express Samsung might not have gone for any big gimmicks, that is if you can forget and forgive, the AR emoji.

This is clearly the Android flagship to beat this year. Buy it if you are on a phone that is two years old. BCW - Business Computing World When it comes down to it, Samsung has yet again put together what is arguably the best all-around Android smartphone available today. Is it better than the Pixel? That depends on what you need and what you value. It's also more power-efficient and can be charged all the way up to per cent in around 80 minutes. Samsung Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus review: Top-notch notch-less Source: Sure, the S9 Plus is the obvious choice if you want dual cameras, a bigger battery, or more screen, but we think the smaller model will be the right choice for most people.

Hands-on Source: Dual camera and improvements over Galaxy S8 makes this the Android smartphone to beat Source: Tech2 The Galaxy S9 Plus still features one of the more eye-catching designs among its competitors. Google Pixel 2 may come with machine learning smarts, but it does not fare well in the looks department. The iPhone 8 Plus is the same old iPhone 6 design with some more glass , but it has a place in the sense that it is one of three new devices that run iOS. A definitive masterpiece Source: India Today Yes. And, it's safe to say, that it delivers on almost all the fronts as well.

There are no two ways about that. If it ain't broke, don't fix it Source: It's one of the leaders of a new generation of hardware, pushing quality design with one of the best displays around. If you really want to stand out, get either phone in the new Lilac Purple colour option. It's looks stunning especially because of the astoundingly bright display and a design that blends the display to the rest of the body.

But more than that, this time, Samsung has taken a new approach to improving the low-light performance of the camera. The rear camera can switch between two apertures. The camera, if one knows how to take good photos, can produce some high-quality shots under poor lighting, especially in a restaurant on indoors, but there are limitations.

Pricecompare

A predictably-exellent flagship uplifted by a standout camera Source: An evolutionary step up Source: Hardware Zone Finally, it's worth noting that the price of Samsung's S range is slowly creeping up. GSM Arena We mentioned how the S9 makes zero sense if you already have the S8, and the S8 can even make a strong case for itself if you're contemplating between the two right now.

It's not quite as easy with the Plus - a whole extra camera makes a difference in a way a second speaker and a 0. The brightest star in the Samsung galaxy Source: The package not just has a delicate yet premium design but also has saturated and immersive display, good stereo speakers, best in class processor, ample RAM and storage, impressive camera and a well-performing battery. Android perfection achieved Source: The rear fingerprint scanner performed flawlessly and my frustration with the offset fingerprint scanner from last year's models is gone.

Although the virtual reality is little overvalued because it is not as extraordinary as it should be plus the prices are very high in range. No Notch Needed Source: Excellence, Refined Source: Many would consider it to be a very small upgrade from the Galaxy S8, and so brushes it off as Samsung playing it safe.

Plus finally means something Source: Samsung really wants to offer the full package. The best all rounder. In that respect, I think the company has succeeded. Excellent, not monumental Source: Samsung's Galaxy S9 and S9 Plus review: The best Android phones around Source: Comparison, online available, Short, Date: It's arguably one of the best designed large format Android phones too, with gorgeous, sleek styling.

And though battery life so far we're still re-testing hasn't dropped in quite where we expected, it's still pretty solid there too. This new Galaxy S device also brings some innovative new features to the mix as well, like Super Slow-Mo, which is just plain fun. Regardless, that's a lot of "bests" Samsung has going on here and that, in our opinion adds up to an Editor's Choice device.

1. Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus price and release date.
2. Connectivity.
3. Compare Samsung Galaxy Player 70 Plus vs Zen M Price, Specs, Review | Gadgets Now?
4. Samsung Galaxy S8 Plus review | TechRadar;
5. One of the best big Android phones you can own.
6. moving wallpaper download for android!
7. Samsung Galaxy S9+ review - The best Galaxy ever is almost perfect | phon-er.com;

Fantastic phone. Each of them offers great design, class-leading hardware, and a feature-packed software experience. For owners of older devices, like the S7 or S6, the Galaxy S9 will feel like a major step forward. And unlike with the iPhone X, the quick charger comes in the box. Standing firm Source: If our experience with the retail version of the smartphone changes, this review will be updated. You need to be a screen-space aficionado or someone with big hands to fully justify its purchase, though.

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus first impressions: Improving upon the S8 Plus just where it was needed Source: Exclusive First Looks: Hardware Zone Two days before Mobile World Congress officially kicked off, I was already in Spain, being secreted to a closed-door preview of the Samsung Galaxy S9 at some back alley gallery in Barcelona, camera in one hand, non-disclosure agreement NDA in another.

Not that there was any real need, considering the S9 has probably been one of the most-leaked smartphones yet. And yes, almost everything you've read about the device to date, is true. A whole new camera experience Source: On the exterior not much has changed, but inside, there's more power, more advanced features and functions and the promise of a camera designed to out-perform all others.

Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus review: Premium specs, top-end performance Source: In both still and video modes, it performs well across the board, delivering consistently good photo and video image quality in all light and shooting situations, thus earning itself our highest DxOMark Mobile score to date. Add one of the best smartphone zooms and a capable bokeh simulation mode to the mix, and the Galaxy S9 Plus is difficult to ignore for any photo-minded smartphone user. I usually take an APS-C nikon coolpix A which is superb but for holiday snaps, the S9 is good enough and versatile allowing editing in phone and video capture with editing of both photo and video in camera.

Conclusion We've only had a few days with the Huawei P20 Pro but that has been long enough to say it is the most advanced smartphone camera to date. General image quality is very good, with good detail, very low noise levels across all light levels and excellent dynamic range. In terms of those parameters the differences to other flagship smartphones, for example the Google Pixel 2 or Samsung Galaxy S9 Plus aren't massive, however.

Where the P20 Pro really leaves the competition behind is zoom. The dedicated 3x tele-lens provides a real advantage in the zoom department and makes this device the best current smartphone for zooming. The triple camera is also capable of creating a natural looking bokeh simulation, and in video mode the image stabilization is up with the very best, creating an almost steady-cam like effect.

I think you should compare with the Huawei P20pro. The photo results are far better then Samsung, Google and Apple. The advantage that Apple has is in the app ecosystem. They're absolutely awful compared to the iOS versions. This is the one area that keeps me chained to iOS. I, as an athlete, simply cannot leave the platform because I need those apps; and what Android offers is utter crap. Many of them start off with Android, but switch to iOS within a year. Android is unusable for this stuff. This also goes to Tablets.

People use iPads for everything, becasue they have the same advantages over Windows and Android. So, it doesn't really matter how amazing the Android cameras get. Is the video captured at a constant frame rate, or not? All prior phone video was variable frame rate. I am talking about frame rate, not bitrate. Variable frame rate makes for very unnatural motion when conformed to standard, constant frame rate video in an editor. So, 60P is not constant 60 fps or On the point of RAW: Myself I've found Adobe not the best candidate for making good images from the RAW files produced by phones, however if you keep in the "phone" mindset and remember its a computer, not just a phone then you can download for instance Snapseed which does a JamHot RAW conversion eg http: The RAW from Phones is awful and full of noise.

Great, in theory, but the sensors haven't gotten to the point where it is ever worth the trouble in developing those RAW files. The camera tends to do "more than good enough" - and definitely better than the average consumer can manage. I don't think the RAW matters, except for saying your phone has an extra feature. This is why while the platforms support it, neither Google nor Apple have bothered to expose this functionality in their stock user interfaces. All those RAW files do, is remind you just how dependent those devices are on software algorithms to spit out a usable photo image stacking, advanced ISPs, etc.

They are not DSLRs. The sensors are all still crap, and the lenses are beyond mediocre. The author seems to take as gospel that an Apple buzzword will work as advertised, while the Samsung gets a far greater shakedown. I personally use a Moto X4. And Blackberry Bold, if we want to go back that far. To be frank, we are revamping these reviews and are learning as we go.

That may be partly responsible for what you see as the greater shakedown of the Samsung. That is a portion of the basis for our assessment. While photographically S9 Plus may be close to Huawei P20 Pro and is better than many other phones, rest assured that you will wait for Android version updates and even important regular security updates for a very long time.

Latest stories

That's even more dissapointing having known how much their phones cost so thay shouldn't be saving money on software development costs. I have been Samsung phone owner for past few years but that was one, among few major factors, why I did not continue with Samsung, at least for some time.

P20 Pro was one of possible options to choose from but since quality of phone photography wasn't a deal breaker for me, I decided to go with OnePlus 6. I got the S9 non-plus last weekend, and am suitably impressed by the single camera it has. I was able to take pictures and video with a phone camera at the fireworks show at Epcot that were surprisingly competitive with my Panasonic GH2. Verizon had a great deal through Best Buy where the phone was almost half price through their service I pay for it through massive phone bills anyways.

No grip whatsoever. I really wanted it, but the size is silly. Still happy with the S9. It's barely wider than a typical 5-inch phone, though longer. It's the only large phone that's not 'silly' IMO. IMHO any phone larger than an S9 is "silly" in that the length and or width gets in a range that if you at all need to stuff it in a pocket, it is likely to get a lot of bending force applied to it. My old Motorola Turbo 2 Loved that phone!

Samsung Galaxy S9+ review - The best Galaxy ever is almost perfect

Now I have an Otter case to minimize this possibility of a bend. One of the leading causes of a cracked screen is bending applied to the rear enclosure putting tension on the display surface, so that when the phone is dropped, the tension is released by cracking. The Samsung enclosure is quite different, so this may not be an issue. The S9 and case fit easily. Honestly I was disappointed because the telephoto camera would be useful. My 5yr old said he hates when ever DPreview mentions the word Apple in products review. So true! It's a time-release Advil cold sinus marketing plan.

The phones feature release is not 12 hours, its 5 years. Then what will have to complain about? Noise reduction is so high that it can be used as tutorials for water painting. WB I guess Auto prone to be cold-ish. Indoor images ISO over are noisy mass. What's there not to like? It's a phone DSLRs are being displaced by every other relevant camera out there not just phones so you might as well just accept it now. Video is generally fine if not moving, but if any type of panning or turning or movement, it turns to garbage very quickly - Massive jello wobble, herky jerky frames, and motion blur.

Video is just not there yet with mobile phones. Not even close. What's the point of stabilization if you can't pan or turn. That's craziness. Either way you lose. Handshake or jerky, take your pick. Pay attention to the processing of small grass in jpg. If you are satisfied, shoot both in pro and auto. In the pro, the color is better tuned, use adjust aperture.

Samsung Galaxy Player 70 Plus - User opinions and reviews

In the auto yellow. Of Rav the photo is perfect. You can shoot in parallel in raw and jpg. Samsung still hasn't produced a single security update, much less an operating system patch, for the unlocked version of the phone, while the locked versions are subject to annoying limitations with bloatware. That, in my view, should be disqualifying, and it's a broader problem for all of Android; it means that Android phones for the most part aren't portable between carriers, and only the Google Pixel series out of the unlocked Android is getting anything like the software support of Apple.

Extremely frustrating for someone who really doesn't want to switch away from Android, but more and more I'm thinking of it. Daniel, there are a number of Android brands that gets updates - newborn Nokia is one of the fastest. Talking of bloatware, my second phone, an iPhone has a lot of Apple apps that I am not allowed to remove.

My solution: It is really funny how distant the flame-wars gets from you when you have one foot in both camps -It gives more time to enjoy life. When you say "unlocked" i think you mean unbranded, because my Rogers Canada phone is unlocked. I don't have any issues with bloatware; the only provider app on my phone is the one to access my account. More significantly, Rogers will only support wifi calling on "their" phones.

In contrast, with Apple in the US, you're almost completely free; full compatibility on all networks, with the exception of the still-missing T-Mobile Band 71, and unlocked phones with full support for all the special carrier features like HD voice and WiFi calling. My main criteria were water resistance and repairability as I hope to get at least 5 years out of this phone.

As far as I am aware, sam mobile do have US firmwares to get rid of carrier bloat. You have to match the model number though or run the risk of bricking the phone. My partner switched from iPhone 6 to samsung S9 and regrets it. She relied on the "wallet" feature iphone has - android doesn't have anything that competes. The camera is quite good for a phone camera, I've only used the normal wide angle lens, and the results are more than satisfactory. Of course such a small sensor camera will suffer in low light, I can never figure out why people here have to make such a big deal about that, its a limitation; deal with it.

The Shutter button can be a little laggy, and I've only experimented with the live focus a few times, but my feeling is that the shortcomings as mentioned in the review can be dealt with in a software update. I'm going to just go ahead and say it: That doesn't mean that i'm going to throw away all my other camera gear, it's just that the S9 makes an awesome always with me camera. I did the same upgrade and share your views. Also the battery life is amazing, for a high-end smartphone nowadays. It last throughout the day with battery to spare for the day after. I recently upgraded from the S5 to the S9 Plus.

I haven't used the camera a great deal, but it is clearly superior in every respect. Overall operation is snappier, the OS is more advanced and the display excellent. I like the bigger screen for video and GPS. I overlooked the wireless charging in my purchase decision, but I'm surprised at how much I enjoy the high speed wireless charging for my car and bedside. The S9 Plus has tremendous battery life--I've never come close to running halfway down in a single day. The S9 Plus also sports removable storage via a microSD card, decent water resistance, a real earphone jack, but NO user-replaceable battery like the old S5.

The curved screen is really more of a gimmick than anything and Bixby and dedicated Bixby button is a waste and should be user-programmable for Google. In all honestly, I wish Samsung would just introduce an advanced S5 with a snappier processor, screen and camera--it would sell a ton.

I don't think flagships that just "work" these days would really sell a lot, you need the wow factor that basically comes from the design. I think these devices have about "hit the wall" in regards to wowser tech--maybe years from now someone will come up with true 3D or death rays. I think there would be a real demand for a powerful common sense smartphone.

Pixel 2 xl which was released last year, takes amazing photos in portrait mode. Just to check the camera I bought Pixel 2 xl for cheap and I can guarantee no other smartphone camera can beat in terms of camera. Front facing camera. Again, Samsung could have learnt from Pixel. Once used to Galaxy can't be happy with other phone except camera area.

Samsung Experience launcher - This is the best launcher in any smartphone.. Samsung came a long way from stupid touchwiz and theming is a great addon. Bixby button - Without rooting, you can remap the Bixby button to Google assistant and I set the long press of this button to switch between vibrate and ring like in iPhone , which is a great add-on.

This button wins over Pixel 2 squeeze. Wireless charging and fast charging - both are amazing and must have features in Anyone who criticize this, clearly haven't tried these features. Galaxy wins in gamng always. That is your personal taste, its like claiming chocolate is better than vanilla, period. Dont confuse opinion with facts please.

Vanilla can be an option with Google launcher on Galaxy, but the true Samsung experience with app shortcuts on the side is a huge upgrade in everyday use. Even multitasking windows are the features from SE. Now, it is not just the taste but what you really get for your money - I am only talking about "usable features" and not gimmicks. You think Google's got a good algorithm, try Adobe's. Note 8's at a pretty good price, Note 9's not out yet but there doesn't seem to be a dramatic change except for a bigger battery.

The 4K video it shoots is even more tack sharp see https: Most importantly, in particular with 8K coming soon yes, it will be in where 4K is today , when you zoom in, you don't see the artefacts common with phone cameras that have much smaller sensors and lenses. Physics cannot be reasoned with. Get a real camera for those important pics and videos.

When that is said, I have the Panasonic LX10 Loved my LX3, before it broke some years ago and this small sensor LX10 takes better pictures than my Nikon D with a bigger sensor, even paired with "good" glass like the Sigma Art ! I guess that is because the D has a lousy autofocus system, while the LX10 even at f1. Still - I take any small sensor smartphone over my original Canon Eos M - that lousy camera almost killed my interest in taking photos.

It's complicated. Take Nokia from 6 years old phone! Ok, you are right, bigger sensor. But I guess, lumia from was maybe little better or comparable in this with new smartphones. I'm still amazed by my lumia - video with 3 times digital zoom was still quite good stabilizated and in full hd still have quite good details comparable to my galaxy S7. My point is - 4K is still not so common nowadays, not even talking about 8K. Bigger challenges will bring better camera phones. And if old years best smartphones can be still so good, I see potential for improvement.

So changed to the Huawei P20 Pro and it surely delivers in the camera department. I hope the DPR staff will review it. It shoots "dark" very low light and "far" 3x zoom or above. In other circumstances the P20 Pro is very unreliable and often smears subtle details introducing heavy sharpening artifacts in their place compared to the competition. Note the jagged edges of the two green lights in this sample: To me S9 is being the most inconsistent performer here, as it "smears subtle details introducing heavy sharpening artifacts in their place compared to the competition" in 1st and 3rd samples.

Not to mention the fact that the zoom performance is consistently below P20 Pro or even iPhone X in terms of overall details.