I previously owned a Nikon f2. So in these circumstances VR in uneccessary. I have found that Panasonic's Dual IS impairs panning and tilting action in shooting video. Would you recommend turning off the camera IS and turning on the lens IS? I hold my camera for most photos and want IS on. Just wondering your thoughts on best configuration. The lens has stabilization. The body has stabilization.

Which do I use? Is it bad to have both on? As you already have all the equipment, it is going to be the best bet to simply try it with your current shooting style. Though, as long as there aren't any issues when using the adapter, it should be no problem using both at the same time.

• nokia 5800 xpressmusic apps download free.
• hot video apps for android.
• 4K Video from iPhone 6S Plus Shows Striking Advantage of Optical Image Stabilization - MacRumors.
• Welcome to Reddit,?
• sony xperia mini pro sk17i kitkat!

If that is problematic however I would probably default to the camera's stabilization. I'm asking that because I don't know if it helps reduce the shake or not since the handheld removes alot of shake but is the lens able to still do the job? There is unfortunately no clear answer to this question. But, it really depends on the type and quality of the stabilizer that you have. You are really going to have to do your own testing with your specific equipment to figure out what works best for you. However, there only seems to be 3 'image stabilization' modes; Standard, Active and Intelligent Active-and from what I gather from forums there is no option to turn it OFF.

I noticed that the image on the monitor was drifting whilst having the camera locked down on a tripod. Is there any way to solve this issue? This is a bit unusual, but I can't seem to find any documentation that says you can turn it off. One thing that might affect this is your shooting mode. Sometimes certain settings are only accessible when in Manual or other "pro" control modes such as program, shutter priority, and aperture priority.

I had a question about IS on video.

I called into the shop I bought the lens from and they said the sound will appear on every single L-series lens and it isn't just mine. The noise bugs me because sometimes I don't have access to my external microphone and I am primarily a videographer but would love to take photographs. Is it true that it is on all Canon L-series lens..?

4K Video from iPhone 6S Plus Shows Striking Advantage of Optical Image Stabilization

Any suggestions or recommendations? At first I thought it was your AF, but if it only comes on when IS is on then its probably something you can't really do anything about. If you have the original mm the issue is that these older Canon lenses are not designed specifically for video and don't take that into account. The newer lenses however should be just fine in video with new motors that are silent specifically for this reason. The only advice I have is that you should look at some newer Canon lenses, especially the STM lenses, as they are designed with video in mind.

I just read this and now second guessing my photos since I was chasing a snowey owl for the last week here in PA I had the VR on for both len's I shoot a Nikon on the one I know they are entry level Body's so could this be my issue, have the VR on There are many reasons why this could be the case, with the likely culprits being the lenses just aren't quite that sharp, the shutter speed was too low if the subject was moving , or a just slightly missed focus. It is possible that VR could introduce some softness, but as there are so many variations I highly advise testing equipment out before a critical shoot.

The answer, as it usually is, is that it depends. If you are shooting handheld with a speedlight and are doing a slow shutter with flash then IS is probably going to be helpful. If you are in a studio set up on a tripod, you'd probably be fine without it. I use them most for video - automotive.

I have read in forums that the IS must also be turned off when using a hand held stabilizer just like using a tripod. The manufacturer of the stabilzer does not mention this in any of the literature. I'm thinking having OSS on would benefit my videos since the camera is physically still moving even though it's more "stable" than just holding by hand.

I have not yet done a side by side comparison on video clips I've take. What is your take on this? I would do some testing with your specific setup to see what works best, but if you are working handheld I could definitely see it benefit you. I would test it out if I were you, but I don't see it being a problem if it is on or off. I have heard using a tripod you should always turn the IS off. I shoot wildlife and was wondering if this is an accurate statement? For the most part I would agree with this statement.

In theory, the tripod should be keeping your camera very still, and the addition of IS has the potential to add more movement than it would correct for, resulting in more blur. But, if you are doing a bit of panning or other quick movements to track subjects, it may be helpful to keep it on, depending on the system. As always, you are going to have to do some tests with your own equipment and style. Hope this helps. Excellent article! Thank you very much.

iPhone 6s Digital vs 6s Plus Optical Image Stabilization Compared [VIDEO] | iPhone in Canada Blog

Let me tell a case of disastrous over-implementation of image stabilization. I presume that by now it is well known. SteadyShot cannot be turned off in this camera! Even at the lowest setting for video, as for stills the system is completely auto, activated when you touch the shutter button it is very aggressive and recording videos using a tripod is an exercise in frustration because everytime you make a minor adjustment to the direction the camera ispointed the SS system tries to "fix" and takes a few seconds to stabilize again.

This also happens in continuous still shooting mode where once you starting shooting the object starts moving around in circles in the screen happens both hand holding and on a tripod. End of rant! Seems like people are saying that IS is not really useful for fast moving objects like in sports. Would this apply to birds too? However, IS can have a substatial impact on your viewfinder and can help stabilize the image to better track your subject. So, if you are birding with a long lens handheld, IS should probably be left on. Does IS make a difference at such high speeds or should I switch it off altogether?

IS has benefits beyond just stabilizing the image. While it will have less impact at high shutter speeds, it is still visible in the viewfinder, making it easier to compose while tracking fast subjects. I would test to see which works best for you, it is only a click of a switch if you find it better one way or the other.

I just read here that it might be best to choose either using lens based VR or body based VR, but not both at the same time. Then there is a side bar that says some manufactures are now allowing dual VR - lens and body together. Would I be running into issues if both were active? In your case, the Nikon D does not have in-body or sensor-based stabilization.

So you will have to rely on the lens-based VR system. Of course for some people, the iPhone 6 Plus might be too big and much less portable. Whatever the reason, the camera itself is not the only reason why you might prefer the iPhone 6 Plus over the iPhone 6.

Top Rated Comments

The iPhone 6 Plus is also more expensive. The optical image stabilization is very effective in making sure that your stills are sharp when shooting at slow shutter speeds and you get stable non-shaky videos. People reporting that the iPhone 6 Plus stabilization is super effective.

• mobile adobe pdf reader software download!
• Want to add to the discussion??
• The best reason to upgrade to iPhone 6s Plus: optical image stabilization.
• rip off britain mobile phone charges!

I personally wanted to know if the Cinematic Video Stabilization the digital stabilization is also available on the iPhone 6, not just the 6 Plus. According to the iPhone 6 official product page, both the 6 and 6 Plus have Cinematic Video Stabilization. So if it works so good for videos, what the added advantage of having an optical image stabilization.

Does it further improve the video stabilization or is it just effective for shooting photos stills? Photos may be more debated but I haven't seen any phone yet that's better at taking videos. That, a generic underpowered snapdragon , lower build quality, terrible design, featureless stock android, no stereo speakers, no pressure sensitive display, no water resistance, you name it Whooooo there partner.

They are pretty late to the OIS game and have had 1, count it one model. I don't think you need to go jumping overboard here. My point is the claim is not even a claim. It's just a statement. It's not like it says "best in class because". It's an unjustified label. So, why are they best in class? Because now the pictures aren't blurry?

Because it can take night time photos? Again, we are not talking about comparing physical OIS to digital which is what the Pixel does. There are lots of cameras that do real OIS and have been working to prefect it for a long time. I've seen no evidence a new comer just "magically" does it better on their first go.

As a rule of thumb I am skeptical of claims that they do. The statement is a claim dude. Disagree if you want, but your cited reasons for it being wrong were rubbish. You want me to cite reason for why it's wrong, but no reasons were given for why it is right.

• sony xperia neo l hard reset code.
• Buy iPhone 6 Plus for its Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)?.
• download game texas poker android.
• being a phone sex operator.
• More Like This.

Best in class? What is this? An award for a car? Apples cameras have been years behind the field for a long time, and still people said "best in class". They add OIS and now it's the "best in class". You should review the history of the reviews and cameras on your own for a little while to get a sense for how goal posts keep getting moved. Let's talk when you do.

I actually didn't and I honestly wish you wouldn't given that your on your own cited reasons were trash. Are cars the only things that have classes?

Related Articles

Anyway, the class is high end smartphones, likely not defined because that's the class the iPhone sits in the smartphone world and it seemed clear from that context. This is not the 3GS lol. This has definitely not been the case for a long time. Also no one claimed it was best in class at those times, so I'm not sure who you're referring to that was saying this. I'm not using car analogies. I think car analogies are wrong. I did not give an analogy and don't like "best in class" other than it has no meaning except, as far as I can tell, for car awards.

What metric used to evaluate the camera isn't defined. Again from context, the OIS video implementation. No, you are evaluating OIS. How you quantify it being better than a competitor is a metric. What metric are you using to evaluate OIS? In fact I'm saying nearly the opposite. Just because Apple is the latest to the OIS party doesn't mean they are the best. Everyone using OIS keeps adapting and improving their cameras and sensors with time.

I might say there would be an argument that the best in class car would be a Ford since they have had many years of experience building cars, but so have lots of companies. In this instance, Apple does not have lots of experience with OIS. They have one model of one phone that have used it. There is no evidence they didn't just decide to subcontract out the OIS to a company who has experience building them. I don't have a metric.

NO ONE popular reviewers has defined an actual metric and evaluated cameras based on it. There is no justification for claiming any phone does OIS better than another. An actual test would involve a point source of light, and a vibration bench where one measures the point spread function of the point source to determine which OIS systems actually preform better. That is the only objective means to measure the OIS of any camera. This is how fields that use and evaluate OIS for other types of uses decide what works and what doesn't.