1. Works - - TED Tenders Electronic Daily;
2. windows phone on android tablet.
3. Κιντερτε για κολικους.
4. La renardière (Holiday home), Pourrières (France) deals.
5. yahoo download for blackberry curve 8520!
6. Ενεργά Φίλτρα:.

No Private Copying Exception. Likewise, in its decision on the merits 8 the Paris Tribunal de Grande Instance ruled out the benefit of both exceptions by holding that there were not two separate copies - one made by Wizzgo and one by the user - but only one copy, made by Wizzgo for each individual user. In such circumstances the benefit of the private copying exception could not be granted as French law requires that the copyist and the user of the copy be the same person. This rule was set by a landmark case in 9 relating to photocopying services offered by a shop where customers made copies of copyrighted works for themselves using a photocopier they paid to use.

The shop - the owner and keeper of the machine - was considered to be the copyist, offering its services to third-party users; it was therefore not making the copies for its own private and domestic use. Wizzgo's service was therefore closer to a digital reproduction service than to a traditional digital video recorder. Moreover, to date none of the media on which the reproduction was made Wizzgo's servers and each user's internal hard drive are subject to the private copy levy in France - which could have ruled out the argument that remuneration was already provided to copyright holders.

In the United States, a comparable 'remote-storage DVR' system was provided by Cablevision without any licences from the relevant movie and television producers. The producers' copyright infringement claims were rejected. Relying on this US example, on the eve of its winding-up, Wizzgo wrote a letter to the French president and the Ministry of Culture, with the support of 80, petition signatories, to advocate the extension of the private copy exception to online DVRs.

The letter has proven timely, as the Creation and Internet Bill is being discussed before Parliament. However far-fetched this attempt to obtain the right to offer its services, Parliamentary rumours suggest that the government could be in favour of abandoning the notion of a 'copyist' and therefore allowing private copies to be made by a third party, as already allowed under German law subject to a requirement that no payment be received as a result.

If an amendment is suggested accordingly, then the television channels are likely to be vocal critics, as in their view such a service conflicts with the normal exploitation of their programmes considering the risk of illicit dissemination of copies, the international access given to their programmes and the unfair competition caused to their own catch-up television and video-on-demand services.

• Matière Sociale.
• sbi mobile banking software free download for nokia c5-03.
• Démarches administratives.
• watch south park episodes android?
• Availability.
• Table des principales décisions jurisprudentielles citées.
• L'aide juridictionnelle : réformer un système à bout de souffle?

The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer. ILO is a premium online legal update service for major companies and law firms worldwide. In-house corporate counsel and other users of legal services, as well as law firm partners, qualify for a free subscription.

View recent newsletter. Cookies We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.

Le village

Confirm Manage account. Forward Share Print. Online DVR Services In May Wizzgo launched the first online DVR platform in France, allowing users to obtain free copies of programmes broadcast on domestic digital terrestrial television channels, limited by a monthly quota of hours and provided that the copy was ordered before the programme started. We would like to ensure that you are still receiving content that you find useful — please confirm that you would like to continue to receive ILO newsletters.



A group of French television channels has recently won a series of copyright infringement claims against Wizzgo, the first provider of online digital video recording DVR services in France. In May Wizzgo launched the first online DVR platform in France, allowing users to obtain free copies of programmes broadcast on domestic digital terrestrial television channels, limited by a monthly quota of hours and provided that the copy was ordered before the programme started.

Le village

According to Wizzgo, its services were no different from a traditional home-owned video cassette recorder or digital video recorder and therefore did not require prior authorization as they were covered by the private copying exception and paid for by the private copy levy. The main difference from a standalone digital video recorder was that the user did not own the machine receiving the broadcast signal to create the copy.

By a series of summary proceedings instituted before the Paris Tribunal de Grande Instance , digital terrestrial television channels M6, W9, 1 France 2, France 3, France 4, France 5, 2 TF1 3 and NT1, 4 and their associated catch-up and video-on-demand services, obtained compensatory damages and injunctive relief with penalties ordering Wizzgo to discontinue its online DVR services. In response to the television channels' claims for infringement of their exclusive programme copyrights, Wizzgo argued that it provided only a "technological platform generating a transient copy… that only the user transforms into a private copy".

Wizzgo's reproduction of programmes was purported to be merely "temporary and transient or incidental", as meant by the exception provided by the Code of Intellectual Property, 5 since its sole purpose was to allow a user to generate his or her own private copy of a programme also covered by French law as an exception to exclusive copyrights.

Denim pour Femme - Achetez Vestes, Chemises et Jeans | Wrangler BE

The summary judgments rejected the benefit of these exceptions on mainly economic grounds inspired by the three-step test, 7 although no reference was made to it , considering that no exception can be claimed when a copy, although delivered free of charge, has an obvious economic value, in this case being the asset necessary to Wizzgo's activity and to its remuneration through the sale of advertising space on its website.

No Private Copying Exception. Likewise, in its decision on the merits 8 the Paris Tribunal de Grande Instance ruled out the benefit of both exceptions by holding that there were not two separate copies - one made by Wizzgo and one by the user - but only one copy, made by Wizzgo for each individual user. In such circumstances the benefit of the private copying exception could not be granted as French law requires that the copyist and the user of the copy be the same person.

Rise and Fall of Online Digital Video Recorders

This rule was set by a landmark case in 9 relating to photocopying services offered by a shop where customers made copies of copyrighted works for themselves using a photocopier they paid to use. The shop - the owner and keeper of the machine - was considered to be the copyist, offering its services to third-party users; it was therefore not making the copies for its own private and domestic use.

Wizzgo's service was therefore closer to a digital reproduction service than to a traditional digital video recorder. Moreover, to date none of the media on which the reproduction was made Wizzgo's servers and each user's internal hard drive are subject to the private copy levy in France - which could have ruled out the argument that remuneration was already provided to copyright holders. In the United States, a comparable 'remote-storage DVR' system was provided by Cablevision without any licences from the relevant movie and television producers.

The producers' copyright infringement claims were rejected. Relying on this US example, on the eve of its winding-up, Wizzgo wrote a letter to the French president and the Ministry of Culture, with the support of 80, petition signatories, to advocate the extension of the private copy exception to online DVRs.