Add to List. Unable to add item to List. Please try again.

Nokia Lumia 920 - our photos

Sorry, there was a problem. There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. List unavailable. Have one to sell? Sell on Amazon. Image Unavailable. Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1.

Nokia Lumia 920 Camera Review

AED Nokia XpressMusic - Blue. Product information Technical Details. Additional Information. Have a question?

There was a problem completing your request. Please try your search again later. Post your question. From the manufacturer. Product Specifications g Dual-core 1. Be more creative with the Nokia Smart Camera With the Nokia Smart Camera, you can take a sequence of photos and then arrange them accordingly to tell the perfect story. See questions and answers.

No customer reviews. With pixel-binning, you throw out all the bad pixels and retain the good ones. So, take an average 7mpxl image, throw out the worst 6mpxls, and end up with a great-looking 1mpxl image, perfect for sending out on limited data plans. It seems to me there is nothing really special to see here and the user cases are rather limited for the optical OS.

• Footer Resource links.
• 10 quotes about the Nokia Lumia 's camera you need to read | Microsoft Devices Blog;
• Related Posts!
• Awesome HD Wallpapers : Nokia Lumia Wallpapers HD;
• Comparable Phones.

The 2nd Pureview camera being less impressive than the first illustrates Microsoft urged Nokia into taking whatever camera tech out of the deep freezer that could be ported quickly to Microsoft OS. Oh I need phone conversation recording. Certainly a plus to have Symbian OS if you are looking for that feature. I kinda expected a bit more in-depth review from dpreview to be honest. I'd like to see the same sort of graphs for noise performance as the normal camera reviews get.

I do agree with the review, the default camera app is weak. Have you tried the app ProShot? This app adds all the manual controls you'd like.

Nokia Lumia - Wikipedia

The only thing missing is HDR and panoramic shots. None give usable results. WP8 needs more apps in this field! Another perfect proof that phones deliver absolutely unusable images. I mean let's be honest what are those crappy images good for, except an awful FB post supplement. Oh, I'd guess about the same things as a huge amount of snapshots taken through history with all sorts of more or less crap cameras - looking at them again later to reminisce about the time and place where they were taken.

Feel like a half-assed attempt by Nokia. Maybe Nokia is desperate but if you want to show off your latest and greatest, it better be the best and greatest. The original iPhone and Lexus LS comes to mind of great product that trump all existing competitors. If this phone packs Lenovo K's hardware and have more thought out controls, it may just be that phone. Reading about 's camera in IT or mobiles' reviews is one thing, reading here is a totally different thing. There is not only a panorama mode but also one with facial recognition. When you were exploring that lenses option, you should have clicked the option to find more lenses.

Panorama is in there as well as smart shoot, which not only has facial recognition but also takes 5 pictures and allows you to pick the best faces for each person from each of those 5 shots. I'm guessing they don't "bake" it in so that they can update the features as they see fit where as if it was built into the camera app, they would probably need to go through Microsoft for any upgrades. There is also the cinemagraph app from Nokia. Since lenses are such a major feature of the camera, it should have been properly reviewed and used. You are of course right, some of these functions are available as a lens although it's not quite clear to me why the panorama app for example is not installed as default.

We'll add more image test data to this review in the near future and also have a closer look at the lenses on that occasion. I don't remember off the top of my head but I'm not sure there was much in the way of any Nokia software being installed by default aside from Nokia Maps and turn by turn and probably because those replaced the default MS apps. MS may not want to much installed by default by anyone, could be why Smartshoot, Panorama and Cinemagraph were left for the user to download.

By the way, on a second read through I'm afraid my post came through more hostile than intended in parts and for that I apologize. What I would love to see is a possible reason for such discrepancy between shots at times. A user below posted a picture he took and it's similar to example shots in the WPCentral forums, seems closer up portraits and other shots turn out great but anything else pretty much falls flat.

It did not come pre-installed on our unit but we have downloaded it and adjusted the text accordingly. Ok, if the marketing blurb risked having this happy S3 owner changing phones, this review doesn't.

The HDR mode alone has delivered some very keepable results on my Sammy really, in good light be extra careful to hold the camera steady and it does what it says on the tin. Unfortunately this review confirms what we already knew: the stabilizer gives a great advantage over other cameraphones in low light, but in standard conditions the quality is worse than all the other high-end phones. The tiny sensor has all the limitations of a standard cameraphone sensor burnt highlights, high noise and to be sincere is even subpar.

I don't want to bash the phone or the OS: I'm just talking about the camera. Colors are too saturated, dynamic range is low, detail is low, lens sharpness is low, there's also some corner softness. Worse than other cameraphones, unless you're really a low-light shooter. I'm happy I bought a Nokia , instead of waiting for the ! My can easily compete with a Canon S90 high-end compact.

I too use the and am very happy with it photo-wise, but it cannot "easily compete" with a S That's an exaggeration, as so many comments here are. Competing does not mean that the is better in every way. Absolutely not! But the captures much more detail, the edge to edge sharpness is much better, it has a much better screen. In high-iso the is a bit better, but not enough to compensate for the lack of IS.