Then you shouldn't have to worry about this. I parked my personal car in the company fleet car garage and they clamped it.

• Get a Samsung Technology Consultation;
• sony xperia sl review the next one.
• can you use a verizon phone on the straight talk network!
• MS Exchange “remote wipe” is a terrible, terrible bug | Hacker News.
• Remote Wipe on a Device using Exchange .

I didn't understand what was happening and called the rescue company telling them it had broken down and wasted lots of time. This was so unfair I quit that day , causing a dramatic fuss pointing out exactly how much they'll suffer. That'll show them. Imagine today one of your employees quits on the spot, tells you he's quitting because his car was clamped. You have no idea who manages the parking lot, but now you just lost a resource on your project.

Drop files to upload

How did your manager end up reacting? Not a true story, an attempt to frame the parent post I was replying to in a different light to show how much of a prima Donna overreaction it would be, and as you say, directed at the wrong people too. Splines on Sept 13, Your analogy would be more apt if you once parked your car in the company lot, and then years later some IT guy sneaks into your house at night and clamps your car.

But you agreed to stick business data on your personal phone. Not sure about other Android versions, but my 2.

1. Introduction

It also warns me about this every time it first connects to Exchange after a reboot. Not much I can do about it. I more or less trust my IT guys not to be dicks so I don't lose any sleep over it. But short of carrying two phones, there's no way for me to separate personal and work devices.

I do keep a nandroid backup on my personal netbook though. Vanilla 2. StavrosK on Sept 12, In defense of this feature, it's very important for when a phone is lost. However, I agree, deleting peoples' data for reasons other than the device was compromised is just a sadistic thing to do. Well, if people are using un-approved personal devices on the corporate network, it seems there is some fault on both sides.

Assuming there is policy addressing this issue.

How to Securely Delete Photos and Clear All Data From Your Android Phone | NDTV Gadgetscom

Sure, but you send out an Email warning people first. There's no reason to wipe people's devices unless they are willfully defying policy, and even then, you've got a list of the people doing it - just go to their office and talk to them in person involve their manager if needed. Wiping a personal device to "send a message" is passive-aggressive and totally destructive to morale. IT is miles away. No one from IT is going to visit their office. They are going to wipe the device per corporate policy.

They have the right to do that, perhaps, but it's still not very nice. People don't do good work when their employer is mean to them, regardless of what they signed. What is your "destroying potentially confidential data" is their "leaving to improve your competitor's product while you spend nine months trying to find a replacement". Balance is the key. It's also quite likely completely illegal - warning or not. It's a personal device - the company has no rights to it. Then it has no business being borged into the corporate IT system of a company which demands rigorous enough control of data to use remote device wipe.

You handed the company rights to it when you added it to the Exchange domain. The only issue at hand is whether a phone should be more explicit in telling you doing this will hand IT complete control of the device. Their "approval" is insufficient.

If they want me to carry a device with data which they have the power to destroy, it's not really mine, so they are going to have to buy one for me. No, not really. If using an un-approved device on the company exchange compromises corporate security, you need to either lecture me, take "disciplinary action", or both. Nuking my iPhone from orbit is neither. You leave your phone in a bar. You tell your IT team about it the next day. You're holding out hope that it'll get turned in.

Answers others found helpful

Meanwhile, god only knows what's on it and who's got it. Sure, you're fired and all, but meanwhile: you handed a bunch of sensitive data out to the world, and firing you doesn't solve that problem.

• Primary Sidebar.
• **SOS** IT department remotely nuked my Priv/Wiped SD card!
• Your Answer!
• descargar candy crush saga gratis para blackberry 9360.
• blackberry 8830 world edition games download.

Should you be told that this is the policy? Of course. But what's the rest of the complaint here? I don't have a problem with them wiping my phone if I leave it in a bar, that's what the feature is for. I have a problem with them, having on their screen a message saying "User X connected an unapproved device to Exchange", choosing to clicking "wipe", knowing they might destroy my personal stuff, instead of writing an e-mail telling me to get off the Exchange within 24 hours, and don't ever do it again, or face a remote wipe.

Yeah, in this case you need to ban the devices, not wipe them Legion on Sept 12, There could be important data still on the device itself, I imagine the argument would be. Seems to me how it should work is that the device's user defines a PIN number for his device. Should the device be lost, the user could provide the IT guys with that PIN number, which would be required for the "remote nuke" feature to be used. That assumes the user is a willing participant in that matter and will give over the PIN. Suppose the user is a remote employee who's just been sacked -- the boss and IT are hundreds of miles away and can't just take the phone from him.

That phone has some product-related emails on it that, if they were to get out, would tank the company's stock price. They have to be able to wipe that data without waiting for the user to hand over the key. No this was done intentionally. Does anybody know how you disable that "feature"? Preferably in such a way that it causes maximum harm to the organization that uses it. Don't connect personal devices to corporate exchange? And in all this time, never did I once see anything on that protocol that could do anything more than download mail and delete the mail you had in your account.

So I hear about Exchange and figure "oh just another protocol MS came up with, properly has extensions for calendars and stuff". Now if I don't know this is going on, how can anybody know? And that is criminal. No, it is not criminal, it is an essential component of ensuring security in lost devices. It would be completely useless if it asked if it was ok to wipe the device. If you are unable to understand that Microsoft added a lot of stuff to the exchange protocol, and this is one of them, perhaps you are in the wrong field.

This is not top secret information, it has been around since Windows CE, and is requested by all big businesses. It's my phone, my property. Nobody gets to access it without my permission, period. If someone sneaks a back door onto my phone, that is criminal. If experienced developers don't know about this feature, there is no earthly way that the average user can be considered to have consented to access.

My boss can't kick down my door and ransack my house to find secret documents he gave me.

If I violate my NDA, he can seek to remedy that in civil court. That you didn't know it meant that is not really grounds for saying it's criminal or whatever. Hey, you know one earthly way you could know about this feature?